Friday, July 3, 2009
An email I sent to Beall through his website on July 5/09. This is the main header on his web page. Here you get a look at a man who appears to suck up to all things victim feminist, doesn’t understand the dynamics or effects of Parental Alienation and is an incipient child abuser. Californians in his district take note. You have an elected representative that cares not about children but about protecting victim feminist mythology.
To representative Beall: I have watched with interest Beall’s support of the abuse of children by wanting to craft a bill that gets rid of PAS in CA courts. Fortunately it did not work but the toughening up of false allegations is a good thing because that is what many so called protective parents do. How many dads are in these PP association do you think? Are they allowed in when they are the sole custodial parent.
Beall’s bravado as shown on this web site is as misplaced as his original bill. PAS already passes the Frye test for science in USA courts and the Mohan test for science in Canadian courts. It will be interesting to see how it plays out once a case is brought forward.
One thing is a certain. Beall is very misguided and NOW amongst other feminist organizations seem to have him in their back pocket. I remain incredulous that some Americans would elect and allow to stand in office a man who would work against the best interest of children and by doing so allow them to be emotionally abused. I shake my head in wonder. Does Beall not know Parental Alienation is performed by both genders or does he just work for one.
Check the ongoing discussion in California here http://parentalalienationcanada.blogspot.com/2009/06/family-law-makeover-california.html or here on the original Sacramento newspaper comment site with the same content. http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/content?oid=1020581
This legislation is quite different than the misguided State Representative Beall started with. Given PAS already has passed the Frye test in USA case law it will be interesting to see how it will proceed in court actions. False accusers should take note. If you are found out the penalties are steep. There is far too much focus on the term Syndrome that has gotten the Victim Feminists hair in a knot. Any parent, male or female, who seeks the loyalty and involvement of a child in a custody fight is an unfit parent. That is not science, heck it isn’t even rocket science, but it is common sense. MJM
Custody and visitation: nonscientific theories.